Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volkswagen Golf 2020 fuel consumption

Volkswagen Golf from 2020 to 2024 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 10% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2020 the Volkswagen Golf average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersVolkswagen GolfAll carmakersVolkswagen Golf
2020+22%+11% +31%+19%
Show all years
2021+20%+12% +27%+19%
2022+18%+12% +24%+19%
2023+16%+12% +22%+19%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Volkswagen Golf.

2020 - 2024

Volkswagen Golf 2020 8 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines34.7 MPG
6.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines33.7 MPG
7.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+10%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines44.6 MPG
5.3 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+28%

Volkswagen Golf 2020 automatic vs manual fuel consumption

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volkswagen Golf 2020 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 4% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
According to user reports of real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Golf with automatic transmission consumes around 0.1 litres per 100 km or 2% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen Golf with 2.0 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Volkswagen Golf 2020 2.0 TDI 150 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2020 1.0 TSI 90 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km+4%
Volkswagen Golf 2020 1.0 eTSI 110 HP automatic 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+8%
Volkswagen Golf 2020 1.0 TSI 110 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+6%
1.5 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2020 1.5 eTSI 130 HP automatic 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2020 1.5 TSI 130 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+20%
Volkswagen Golf 2020 1.5 eTSI 150 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2020 1.5 TSI 150 HP manual 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+24%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2020 GTI 2.0 TSI 245 HP manual 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2020 GTI 2.0 TSI 245 HP automatic 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2020 GTI Clubsport 2.0 TSI 300 HP automatic 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+9%
Volkswagen Golf 2021 R 2.0 TSI 315 HP 4x4 manual 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2021 R 2.0 TSI 315 HP 4x4 automatic 26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km0%
Volkswagen Golf 2020 R 2.0 TSI 320 HP 4x4 automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km+15%
Volkswagen Golf 2022 R 20 Years 2.0 TSI 333 HP 4x4 automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km+17%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 2020 2.0 TDI 115 HP manual 67.2 MPG
3.5 l/100km
49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km+37%
Volkswagen Golf 2020 2.0 TDI 150 HP manual 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+18%
Volkswagen Golf 2020 2.0 TDI 150 HP automatic 63.6 MPG
3.7 l/100km
44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km+43%
Volkswagen Golf 2020 GTD 2.0 TDI 200 HP automatic 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+12%
2020 - 2024

Volkswagen Golf 2020 8 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines38.1 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines35.5 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+9%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines49.7 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+8%

Volkswagen Golf 2020 automatic vs manual fuel consumption

As indicated by the advertised fuel consumption, Volkswagen Golf 2020 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox.
According to user reports of real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Golf with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen Golf with 2.0 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Volkswagen Golf 2020 2.0 TDI 150 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2020 1.0 eTSI 110 HP automatic 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2020 1.0 TSI 110 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+2%
1.5 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2020 1.5 TSI 130 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+7%
Volkswagen Golf 2020 1.5 eTSI 150 HP automatic 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+12%
Volkswagen Golf 2020 1.5 TSI 150 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+9%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2021 2.0 TSI 190 HP 4x4 automatic 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2021 R 2.0 TSI 320 HP 4x4 automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km+15%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 2020 2.0 TDI 115 HP manual 51.1 MPG
4.6 l/100km
49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km+4%
Volkswagen Golf 2020 2.0 TDI 115 HP automatic 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+6%
Volkswagen Golf 2020 2.0 TDI 150 HP automatic 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km+13%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.