Toyota Aygo 2018 fuel consumption
Toyota Aygo from 2018 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 20% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 28% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 12% higher. Since 2018 the Toyota Aygo average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Toyota Aygo | |||
2018 | +28% | +29% | ||
Show all years | ||||
2019 | +28% | +29% | ||
2020 | +27% | +29% | ||
2021 | +26% | +29% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Toyota Aygo.
2018 - 2021
Toyota Aygo 2018 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +29% |
Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Toyota Aygo with automatic transmission consumes around 0.2 litres per 100 km or 4% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Toyota Aygo 2018 1.0 VVT-i 72 HP manual | 45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
|
Toyota Aygo 2018 1.0 VVT-i 72 HP automatic | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km+29% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.