Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Subaru Outback 2019 fuel consumption

Subaru Outback from 2019 to 2025 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 11% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 9% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 13% higher. Since 2019 the Subaru Outback average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersSubaru Outback
2019+25%insignificant
Show all years
2020+22%insignificant
2021+20%insignificant
2022+18%insignificant
2023+16%insignificant

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Subaru Outback.

2019 - 2025

Subaru Outback 2019 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines27.5 MPG
8.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.4 liter petrol engine
Subaru Outback 2019 XT 2.4Turbo 260 HP 4x4 automatic 26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
Subaru Outback 2021 Wilderness 2.4 260 HP 4x4 automatic 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
2.5 liter petrol engine
Subaru Outback 2019 2.5i 169 HP 4x4 automatic 27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km-2%
Subaru Outback 2019 2.5 182 HP 4x4 automatic 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
Subaru Outback 2021 2.5i 188 HP 4x4 automatic 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.