Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Smart ForTwo 2004 fuel consumption

Smart ForTwo from 2004 to 2007 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 31% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 29% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 33% higher. Since 2004 the Smart ForTwo average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersSmart ForTwoAll carmakersSmart ForTwo
2004+7%+18% +9%+26%
Show all years
2005+8%+18% +10%+26%
2006+9%+18% +11%+26%
2007+10%+18% +12%+26%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Smart ForTwo.

2004 - 2007

Smart ForTwo 2004 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines47.4 MPG
5.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines40.1 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+18%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines69.2 MPG
3.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+26%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
0.6 liter petrol engine
Smart Fortwo 2004 0.6 Coupe 50 HP automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+21%
0.7 liter petrol engine
Smart Fortwo 2004 0.7 Coupe 61 HP automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+23%
Smart Fortwo 2004 0.7 Coupe Brabus 75 HP automatic 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+11%
0.8 liter diesel engine
Smart Fortwo 2004 0.8 Coupe Cdi 41 HP automatic 69.2 MPG
3.4 l/100km
54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km+26%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.