Skoda Octavia 2019 fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Skoda Octavia | All carmakers | Skoda Octavia | |
| 2019 | +27% | +14% | +35% | +47% |
| Show all years | ||||
| 2020 | +26% | +14% | +34% | +47% |
| 2021 | +25% | +14% | +33% | +47% |
| 2022 | +24% | +14% | +31% | +47% |
| 2023 | +24% | +14% | +31% | +47% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Skoda Octavia.
Skoda Octavia 2019 wagon fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 36.6 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 35.8 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +15% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 63.6 MPG 3.7 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 41.6 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +47% |
Skoda Octavia 2019 automatic vs manual fuel consumption
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Skoda Octavia 2019 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.1 liters per 100 km or 17% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
According to user reports of real-world fuel consumption, this generation Skoda Octavia with automatic transmission consumes around 0.2 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Skoda Octavia fuel economy is among the best, beating more than 80% of other cars. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Skoda Octavia 2019 1.0 TSI 110 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Skoda Octavia 2019 1.0 TSI 110 HP manual | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km+15% |
| Skoda Octavia 2020 1.0 TSI EVO e-TEC 110 HP automatic | 45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
|
| 1.5 liter petrol engine | ||
| Skoda Octavia 2019 1.5 TSI 150 HP manual | 47.0 MPG 5.0 l/100km |
36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+28% |
| Skoda Octavia 2019 1.5 TSI 150 HP automatic | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TSI 4x4 190 HP automatic | 31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km+3% |
| Skoda Octavia 2020 RS 2.0 TSI 245 HP manual | 32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
|
| Skoda Octavia 2020 RS 2.0 TSI 245 HP automatic | 26.1 MPG 9.0 l/100km |
|
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TDI 116 HP manual | 63.6 MPG 3.7 l/100km |
43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km+46% |
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TDI 116 HP automatic | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
|
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TDI 150 HP manual | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
|
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TDI 150 HP automatic | 63.6 MPG 3.7 l/100km |
42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km+49% |
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TDI 4x4 150 HP automatic | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
|
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TDI 4x4 200 HP automatic | 36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km |
|
Skoda Octavia 2019 hatchback fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 38.7 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 35.8 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +13% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 63.6 MPG 3.7 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 41.5 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +46% |
Skoda Octavia 2019 automatic vs manual fuel consumption
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Skoda Octavia 2019 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.1 liters per 100 km or 2% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
According to user reports of real-world fuel consumption, this generation Skoda Octavia with automatic transmission consumes around 0.1 litres per 100 km or 2% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Skoda Octavia fuel economy is among the best, beating more than 80% of other cars. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Skoda Octavia 2019 1.0 TSI 110 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Skoda Octavia 2019 1.0 TSI 110 HP manual | 45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km+6% |
| Skoda Octavia 2020 1.0 TSI EVO e-TEC 110 HP automatic | 47.0 MPG 5.0 l/100km |
|
| 1.5 liter petrol engine | ||
| Skoda Octavia 2019 1.5 TSI 150 HP manual | 47.0 MPG 5.0 l/100km |
36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+28% |
| Skoda Octavia 2019 1.5 TSI 150 HP automatic | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TSI 4x4 190 HP automatic | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km+4% |
| Skoda Octavia 2020 vRS 2.0 TSI 245 HP manual | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
|
| Skoda Octavia 2020 vRS 2.0 TSI 245 HP automatic | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
|
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TDI 116 HP manual | 63.6 MPG 3.7 l/100km |
44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km+43% |
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TDI 116 HP automatic | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
|
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TDI 150 HP manual | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
|
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TDI 150 HP automatic | 63.6 MPG 3.7 l/100km |
42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km+49% |
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TDI 4x4 150 HP automatic | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
|
| Skoda Octavia 2019 2.0 TDI 4x4 200 HP automatic | 36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.