Rover 75 fuel consumption

Of all Rover 75 modifications produced from 1999 to 2005 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 8% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 5% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 11% higher. Starting from 1999 Rover 75 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2005 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

Year	Gasoline cars		Diesel cars
Year	All carmakers	Rover 75	All carmakers	Rover 75
1999	+3%	+8%	+5%	+8%
Show all years
2000	+4%	+8%	+5%	+8%
2001	+5%	+7%	+6%	+8%
2002	+6%	+10%	+7%	+8%
2003	+6%	+10%	+8%	+10%
2004	+7%	+9%	+9%	+10%
2005	+8%	insignificant	+10%	+12%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Rover 75.

2004 - 2005

Rover 75 2004 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	24.3 MPG 9.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	37.0 MPG 6.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+12%

Rover 75 2004 specs Rover 75 2004 owner reviews

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Rover 75 2004 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.2 liters per 100 km or 18% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Rover 75 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.6 litres per 100 km or 25% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Rover 75 fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Rover 75 2004 Tourer 2.0 CDTI 131 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Rover 75 with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Rover 75 2004 Tourer 1.8 Turbo 150 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Rover 75 2004 Tourer 1.8 120 HP manual	30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km
Rover 75 2004 Tourer 1.8 Automatic 120 HP automatic	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km
Rover 75 2004 Tourer 1.8 Turbo 150 HP manual	29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km
Rover 75 2004 Tourer 1.8 Turbo Automatic 150 HP automatic	26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Rover 75 2004 Tourer 2.0 CDT 116 HP manual	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km
Rover 75 2004 Tourer 2.0 CDT Automatic 116 HP automatic	34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km
Rover 75 2004 Tourer 2.0 CDTI 131 HP manual	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km	37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km+9%
Rover 75 2004 Tourer 2.0 CDTI Automatic 131 HP automatic	34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km	29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km+14%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Rover 75 2004 Tourer 2.5 V6 Automatic 177 HP automatic	22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km	22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km0%
4.6 liter petrol engine
Rover 75 2005 Tourer 4.6 V8 260 HP automatic	17.6 MPG 13.4 l/100km

Do you own a Rover 75? Please share your fuel economy!

2004 - 2005

Rover 75 2004 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	24.3 MPG 9.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	37.0 MPG 6.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+12%

Rover 75 2004 specs Rover 75 2004 owner reviews

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Rover 75 fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Rover 75 2004 2.0 CDTI 131 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Rover 75 with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Rover 75 2004 1.8 Turbo 150 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Rover 75 2004 1.8 120 HP manual	30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km
Rover 75 2004 1.8 Automatic 120 HP automatic	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km
Rover 75 2004 1.8 Turbo 150 HP manual	29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km
Rover 75 2004 1.8 Turbo Automatic 150 HP automatic	26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Rover 75 2004 2.0 CDT 116 HP manual	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km
Rover 75 2004 2.0 CDT Automatic 116 HP automatic	34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km
Rover 75 2004 2.0 CDTI 131 HP manual	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km	37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km+9%
Rover 75 2004 2.0 CDTI Automatic 131 HP automatic	34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km	29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km+14%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Rover 75 2004 2.5 V6 177 HP automatic	22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km	22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km+1%
4.6 liter petrol engine
Rover 75 2004 4.6 V8 260 HP automatic	17.6 MPG 13.4 l/100km

Do you own a Rover 75? Please share your fuel economy!

2001 - 2004

Rover 75 2001 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	25.4 MPG 9.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	23.6 MPG 10.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+7%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	37.0 MPG 6.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	34.0 MPG 6.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+9%

Rover 75 2001 specs Rover 75 2001 owner reviews

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Rover 75 2001 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.2 liters per 100 km or 17% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Rover 75 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.8 litres per 100 km or 12% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Rover 75 fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Rover 75 2001 Tourer 2.0 CDT 116 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Rover 75 with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Rover 75 2002 Tourer 1.8 Turbo 150 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Rover 75 2001 Tourer 1.8 120 HP manual	30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km
Rover 75 2001 Tourer 1.8 Automatic 120 HP automatic	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km
Rover 75 2002 Tourer 1.8 Turbo 150 HP manual	29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km+18%
Rover 75 2002 Tourer 1.8 Turbo Automatic 150 HP automatic	26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
Rover 75 2001 Tourer 2.0 V6 150 HP manual	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km0%
Rover 75 2001 Tourer 2.0 V6 Automatic 150 HP automatic	22.0 MPG 10.7 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Rover 75 2001 Tourer 2.0 CDT 116 HP manual	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km	37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km+9%
Rover 75 2001 Tourer 2.0 CDT Automatic 116 HP automatic	34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km	32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km+6%
Rover 75 2003 Tourer 2.0 CDTI 131 HP manual	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km	34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+17%
Rover 75 2003 Tourer 2.0 CDTI Automatic 131 HP automatic	34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km	32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km+6%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Rover 75 2001 Tourer 2.5 V6 177 HP automatic	22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km	21.2 MPG 11.1 l/100km+5%

Do you own a Rover 75? Please share your fuel economy!

1999 - 2004

Rover 75 1999 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+10%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	37.0 MPG 6.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	34.0 MPG 6.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+9%

Rover 75 1999 specs Rover 75 1999 owner reviews

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Rover 75 1999 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.3 liters per 100 km or 18% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Rover 75 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.2 litres per 100 km or 14% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Rover 75 advertised fuel economy is slightly worse than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Rover 75 1999 2.0 CDT 116 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Rover 75 with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Rover 75 2002 1.8 Turbo 150 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Rover 75 1999 1.8 120 HP manual	30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km	25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km+17%
Rover 75 1999 1.8 Automatic 120 HP automatic	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km
Rover 75 2002 1.8 Turbo 150 HP manual	29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km+18%
Rover 75 2002 1.8 Turbo Automatic 150 HP automatic	26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
Rover 75 1999 2.0 V6 150 HP manual	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km	23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km+5%
Rover 75 1999 2.0 V6 Automatic 150 HP automatic	21.2 MPG 11.1 l/100km	19.8 MPG 11.9 l/100km+7%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Rover 75 1999 2.0 CDT 116 HP manual	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km	37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km+9%
Rover 75 1999 2.0 CDT Automatic 116 HP automatic	34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km	32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km+6%
Rover 75 2003 2.0 CDTI 131 HP manual	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km	34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+17%
Rover 75 2003 2.0 CDTI Automatic 131 HP automatic	34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km	32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km+6%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Rover 75 1999 2.5 V6 177 HP automatic	22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km	22.0 MPG 10.7 l/100km+2%

Do you own a Rover 75? Please share your fuel economy!

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.