Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Renault Laguna fuel consumption

Of all Renault Laguna modifications produced from 2001 to 2018 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 16% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 14% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 18% higher. Starting from 2001 Renault Laguna average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2005 it was slightly above industry average, at 2008 difference became less than industry average and finally at 2014 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. It should be noted that the gap between advertised and actual fuel economy changed quite significantly across the entire automotive industry during this period. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersRenault LagunaAll carmakersRenault Laguna
2001+5%+17% +6%+11%
Show all years
2002+6%+15% +7%+13%
2003+6%+14% +8%+10%
2004+7%+13% +9%+10%
2005+8%+13% +10%+8%
2006+9%+13% +11%+8%
2007+11%+13% +12%+9%
2008+12%+13% +13%+9%
2009+14%+13% +14%+9%
2010+16%+14% +16%+12%
2011+19%+16% +19%+16%
2012+21%+16% +23%+20%
2013+23%+17% +27%+26%
2014+26%-+30%+35%
2015+27%-+33%+35%
2016+28%-+36%+35%
2017+28%-+38%+35%
2018+28%-+39%+33%

Select Renault Laguna generation

For detailed fuel economy data, including advertised versus real-world fuel consumption and consumption differences between different engines and transmissions.

Renault Laguna 2013 hatchback fuel economy Renault Laguna 2012 wagon, coupe fuel economy Renault Laguna 2010 - 2013 hatchback fuel economy Renault Laguna 2008 - 2012 wagon, coupe fuel economy Renault Laguna 2007 - 2010 hatchback fuel economy Renault Laguna 2005 - 2006 wagon, hatchback fuel economy Renault Laguna 2001 - 2005 wagon, hatchback fuel economy
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.