Mercedes E class 2016 fuel consumption
Mercedes E class from 2016 to 2020 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 13% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 10% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 16% higher. Starting from 2017 Mercedes E class average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 2018 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Diesel cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Mercedes E class | |||
| 2017 | +36% | +22% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2018 | +36% | +41% | ||
| 2019 | +33% | +44% | ||
| 2020 | +31% | +44% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mercedes E class.
2016 - 2020
Mercedes E class 2016 W213 sedan fuel economy
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 33.7 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +54% |
Mercedes E class 2016 specs
Mercedes E class 2016 owner reviewsMercedes E class service info and schedule
Mercedes E class 2016 automatic vs manual fuel consumption
Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes E class with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 6% less fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mercedes E class advertised fuel economy is one of the best, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is among the 20% worst in its class.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes E 200 184 HP manual | 26.1 MPG 9.0 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 200 Automatic 184 HP 4x4 automatic | 27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 200 Automatic 184 HP automatic | 27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 250 211 HP automatic | 26.1 MPG 9.0 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 300 245 Hp 245 HP automatic | 24.2 MPG 9.7 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 300 258 Hp 258 HP automatic | 29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 350 299 HP automatic | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
|
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Mercedes E 200d 150 HP automatic | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 220d Automatic 194 HP automatic | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 220d Automatic 194 HP 4x4 automatic | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 300 d 245 HP automatic | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
|
| 2.9 liter diesel engine | ||
| Mercedes E 350d 286 HP automatic | 34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 400d 340 HP 4x4 automatic | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km+54% |
| 3.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes E 450 V6 367 HP 4x4 automatic | 23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes AMG E 43 401 HP 4x4 automatic | 20.5 MPG 11.5 l/100km |
|
| 3.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Mercedes E 350d V6 Automatic 258 HP 4x4 automatic | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 350d V6 Automatic 258 HP automatic | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
|
| 4.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes AMG E 63 V8 571 HP 4x4 automatic | 15.2 MPG 15.5 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes AMG E 63 S V8 612 HP 4x4 automatic | 17.0 MPG 13.8 l/100km |
|
2016 - 2020
Mercedes E class 2016 C238 coupe fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.4 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 27.1 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 42.3 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +33% |
Mercedes E class 2016 specs
Mercedes E class 2016 owner reviewsMercedes E class service info and schedule
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes E 200 184 Hp Automatic 184 HP automatic | 27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 200 184 Hp Automatic 184 HP 4x4 automatic | 28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 200 197 Hp Automatic 197 HP 4x4 automatic | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 200 197 Hp Automatic 197 HP automatic | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 300 258 Hp 258 HP automatic | 29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 350 299 HP automatic | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
|
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Mercedes E 220d Automatic 194 HP automatic | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 220d Automatic 194 HP 4x4 automatic | 36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 300d 245 HP automatic | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
|
| 2.9 liter diesel engine | ||
| Mercedes E 350 d 286 HP automatic | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km+30% |
| Mercedes E 400d 340 HP 4x4 automatic | 47.0 MPG 5.0 l/100km |
31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km+48% |
| 3.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes E 400 333 HP 4x4 automatic | 22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 450 V6 Automatic 367 HP 4x4 automatic | 23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes E 450 V6 Automatic 367 HP 4x4 automatic | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
|
| Mercedes AMG E 53 435 HP 4x4 automatic | 32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
|
| 3.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Mercedes E 350d 258 HP 4x4 automatic | 37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km |
30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km+22% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.