Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mercedes C class 2011 fuel consumption

Mercedes C class from 2011 to 2016 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 20% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2011 Mercedes C class average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2013 it was slightly above industry average, at 2014 difference became similar to average and finally at 2016 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersMercedes C classAll carmakersMercedes C class
2011+19%+27% +19%+28%
Show all years
2012+21%+27% +23%+28%
2013+23%+27% +27%+28%
2014+26%+24% +30%+34%
2015+27%+24% +33%+34%
2016+28%+24% +36%+34%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mercedes C class.

2011 - 2013

Mercedes C class 2011 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines31.0 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines24.9 MPG
9.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+25%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines45.1 MPG
5.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+25%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mercedes C class 2011 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.1 liters per 100 km or 3% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes C class with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 7% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mercedes C class advertised fuel economy is among the best, beating more than 80% of other cars, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is significantly above average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.1 diesel engine and manual transmission (Mercedes C 250 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mercedes C class with 2.1 diesel engine and manual transmission (Mercedes C 220 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 170 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 180 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 156 HP manual 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+9%
Mercedes C 180 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 156 HP automatic 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+27%
Mercedes C 200 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 184 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km+25%
Mercedes C 200 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 184 HP automatic 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+27%
Mercedes C 250 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP automatic 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km+34%
2.1 liter diesel engine
Mercedes C 180 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 120 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+27%
Mercedes C 180 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 120 HP automatic 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+22%
Mercedes C 200 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+25%
Mercedes C 200 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136 HP automatic 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+24%
Mercedes C 220 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 170 HP manual 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+28%
Mercedes C 220 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 170 HP automatic 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+29%
Mercedes C 250 2011 CDI 4Matic BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP 4x4 automatic 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+5%
Mercedes C 250 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+27%
Mercedes C 250 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP automatic 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+35%
3.0 liter diesel engine
Mercedes C 300 2011 CDI 4Matic BlueEFFICIENCY 231 HP 4x4 automatic 26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
Mercedes C 350 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 265 HP automatic 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+30%
3.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 350 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 306 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km+37%
6.2 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 63 2011 AMG 457 HP automatic 19.1 MPG
12.3 l/100km
16.2 MPG
14.5 l/100km+18%
2011 - 2013

Mercedes C class 2011 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines32.0 MPG
7.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines24.9 MPG
9.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+30%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines46.6 MPG
5.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+29%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Mercedes C class 2011 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes C class with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 4% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mercedes C class advertised fuel economy is one of the best, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is significantly above average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.1 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Mercedes C 250 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mercedes C class with 2.1 diesel engine and manual transmission (Mercedes C 220 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 170 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 180 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 156 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+10%
Mercedes C 180 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 156 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+31%
Mercedes C 200 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 184 HP manual 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km+30%
Mercedes C 200 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 184 HP automatic 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+31%
Mercedes C 250 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km+41%
2.1 liter diesel engine
Mercedes C 180 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 120 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+27%
Mercedes C 180 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 120 HP automatic 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+27%
Mercedes C 200 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+25%
Mercedes C 200 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136 HP automatic 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+29%
Mercedes C 220 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 170 HP manual 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+36%
Mercedes C 220 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 170 HP automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+38%
Mercedes C 250 2011 CDI 4Matic BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP 4x4 automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+25%
Mercedes C 250 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+29%
Mercedes C 250 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+21%
3.0 liter diesel engine
Mercedes C 300 2011 CDI 4Matic BlueEFFICIENCY 231 HP 4x4 automatic 26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
Mercedes C 350 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 265 HP automatic 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+32%
3.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 350 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 306 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km+43%
6.2 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 63 2011 AMG 457 HP automatic 19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km
16.2 MPG
14.5 l/100km+21%
2011

Mercedes C class 2011 coupe fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+24%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines49.3 MPG
4.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines36.9 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+34%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mercedes C class 2011 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 6% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes C class with automatic transmission consumes around 0.6 litres per 100 km or 9% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Mercedes C class fuel economy is significantly above average. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 3.5 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Mercedes C 350 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 306 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 180 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 156 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+10%
Mercedes C 180 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 156 HP automatic 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
Mercedes C 250 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 240 HP automatic 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+26%
2.1 liter diesel engine
Mercedes C 220 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 170 HP manual 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+36%
Mercedes C 220 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 170 HP automatic 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+31%
Mercedes C 250 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+27%
Mercedes C 250 2011 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP automatic 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+41%
3.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 350 2011 BlueEFFICIENCY 306 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+40%
6.2 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 63 2011 AMG 457 HP automatic 19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km
16.4 MPG
14.3 l/100km+19%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.