Mercedes C class 2007 fuel consumption

Mercedes C class from 2007 to 2011 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 20% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2007 Mercedes C class average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2008 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

Year	Gasoline cars		Diesel cars
Year	All carmakers	Mercedes C class	All carmakers	Mercedes C class
2007	+11%	+10%	+12%	+11%
Show all years
2008	+12%	+10%	+13%	+11%
2009	+14%	+10%	+14%	+11%
2010	+16%	+10%	+16%	+11%
2011	+19%	+10%	+19%	+11%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mercedes C class.

2007 - 2011

Mercedes C class 2007 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	25.7 MPG 9.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	24.4 MPG 9.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+5%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	35.0 MPG 6.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	32.4 MPG 7.3 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+10%

Mercedes C class 2007 specs Mercedes C class 2007 owner reviews Mercedes C class service info and schedule

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mercedes C class 2007 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes C class with automatic transmission consumes around 0.7 litres per 100 km or 9% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 3.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mercedes C 280 2007 231 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mercedes C class with 3.5 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Mercedes C 350 2007 272 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 180 2007 Kompressor 156 HP manual	30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km	28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km+5%
Mercedes C 180 2007 Kompressor 156 HP automatic	28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km	26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km+9%
2.1 liter diesel engine
Mercedes C 200 2007 CDI 136 HP manual	39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km	37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km+7%
Mercedes C 200 2007 CDI 136 HP automatic	38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km	35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km+10%
Mercedes C 220 2007 CDI 170 HP manual	39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km	36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+8%
Mercedes C 220 2007 CDI 170 HP automatic	34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km	33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km+3%
Mercedes C 250 2009 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP manual		36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km
Mercedes C 250 2009 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 204 HP automatic		33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km
2.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 230 2007 204 HP manual	25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km	24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km+5%
Mercedes C 230 2007 204 HP automatic	24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km	24.2 MPG 9.7 l/100km+2%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 280 2007 231 HP manual	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km	23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km+6%
Mercedes C 280 2007 231 HP automatic	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km	22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km+13%
Mercedes C 300 2009 231 HP manual	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km	25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km-2%
Mercedes C 300 2009 231 HP automatic	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km	21.8 MPG 10.8 l/100km+15%
3.0 liter diesel engine
Mercedes C 320 2007 CDI 224 HP manual	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km	27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km+20%
Mercedes C 320 2007 CDI 224 HP automatic	31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km	27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km+13%
Mercedes C 320 2007 CDI 4WD 224 HP automatic	30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km	27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km+10%
3.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 350 2007 272 HP automatic	23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km	20.8 MPG 11.3 l/100km+14%

Do you own a Mercedes C class? Please share your fuel economy!

2007 - 2011

Mercedes C class 2007 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	26.1 MPG 9.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+12%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	35.3 MPG 6.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	31.7 MPG 7.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+11%

Mercedes C class 2007 specs Mercedes C class 2007 owner reviews Mercedes C class service info and schedule

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mercedes C class 2007 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 6% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes C class with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Mercedes C class fuel economy is average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 3.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mercedes C 280 2007 231 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mercedes C class with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mercedes C 180 2007 Kompressor 156 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 180 2009 Kompressor BlueEFFICIENCY 156 HP manual	32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km	28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km+12%
Mercedes C 180 2009 Kompressor BlueEFFICIENCY 156 HP automatic	30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km	26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km+14%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 180 Kompressor 156 HP automatic	30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km	25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km+21%
Mercedes C 180 2007 Kompressor 156 HP manual	31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km	28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km+11%
Mercedes C 200 2007 Kompressor 184 HP manual	30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km	25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km+18%
Mercedes C 200 2007 Kompressor 184 HP automatic	29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km	25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km+15%
2.1 liter diesel engine
Mercedes C 200 2007 CDI 136 HP manual	41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km	37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km+11%
Mercedes C 200 2007 CDI 136 HP automatic	36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km	35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km+3%
Mercedes C 220 2007 CDI 170 HP manual	39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km	36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+8%
Mercedes C 220 2007 CDI 170 HP automatic	35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km	33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km+6%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 230 2007 204 HP manual	25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km	24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km+5%
Mercedes C 230 2007 204 HP automatic	25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km	24.2 MPG 9.7 l/100km+4%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 280 2007 231 HP manual	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km	23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km+6%
Mercedes C 280 2007 231 HP automatic	25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km	22.6 MPG 10.4 l/100km+11%
Mercedes C 280 2007 4MATIC 231 HP 4x4 automatic	24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km	22.0 MPG 10.7 l/100km+11%
3.0 liter diesel engine
Mercedes C 320 2007 CDI 224 HP manual	34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km	27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km+23%
Mercedes C 320 2007 CDI 224 HP automatic	32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km	27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km+16%
Mercedes C 320 2007 CDI 4MATIC 224 HP 4x4 automatic	30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km	27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km+10%
3.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 350 2007 272 HP automatic	24.2 MPG 9.7 l/100km	20.8 MPG 11.3 l/100km+16%
Mercedes C 350 2007 4MATIC 272 HP 4x4 automatic	23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km	20.8 MPG 11.3 l/100km+13%
6.2 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 63 2007 AMG 457 HP automatic	17.6 MPG 13.4 l/100km	14.5 MPG 16.2 l/100km+21%

Do you own a Mercedes C class? Please share your fuel economy!

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.