Land Rover Range Rover 2002 fuel consumption
Land Rover Range Rover from 2002 to 2005 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 15% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 11% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 20% higher. Since 2002 the Land Rover Range Rover average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Diesel cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Land Rover Range Rover | |||
| 2002 | +7% | +8% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2003 | +8% | +8% | ||
| 2004 | +9% | +8% | ||
| 2005 | +10% | +8% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Land Rover Range Rover.
2002 - 2005
Land Rover Range Rover 2002 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 14.5 MPG 16.2 l/100km |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 20.8 MPG 11.3 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 19.3 MPG 12.2 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +8% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.9 liter diesel engine | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover 2002 2.9 Td6 177 HP 4x4 automatic | 20.8 MPG 11.3 l/100km |
19.3 MPG 12.2 l/100km+8% |
| 4.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover 2002 4.4 V8 282 HP 4x4 automatic | 14.5 MPG 16.2 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.