Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 fuel consumption

Land Rover Range Rover Sport from 2009 to 2013 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 24% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 27% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 20% higher. Since 2009 the Land Rover Range Rover Sport average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearDiesel cars
All carmakersLand Rover Range Rover Sport
2009+14%+32%
Show all years
2010+16%+32%
2011+19%+32%
2012+23%+32%
2013+27%+32%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Land Rover Range Rover Sport.

2009 - 2013

Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines16.3 MPG
14.5 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines23.2 MPG
10.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines19.4 MPG
12.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+32%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
3.0 liter diesel engine
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 3.0 TD 4WD 245 HP automatic 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
19.4 MPG
12.1 l/100km+32%
3.6 liter diesel engine
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 3.6 TD 4WD 272 HP automatic 21.2 MPG
11.1 l/100km
5.0 liter petrol engine
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 5.0 4WD 375 HP automatic 16.9 MPG
13.9 l/100km
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 Supercharged 5.0 4WD 510 HP automatic 15.7 MPG
15.0 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.