Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 fuel consumption

Land Rover Range Rover Sport from 2005 to 2009 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 24% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 27% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 20% higher. Starting from 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2006 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearDiesel cars
All carmakersLand Rover Range Rover Sport
2005+10%+8%
Show all years
2006+11%+8%
2007+12%+8%
2008+13%+8%
2009+14%+8%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Land Rover Range Rover Sport.

2005 - 2009

Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines15.3 MPG
15.4 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines22.1 MPG
10.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+8%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.7 liter diesel engine
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 2.7 TdV6 190 HP 4x4 automatic 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km+8%
3.6 liter diesel engine
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006 3.6 TDV8 275 HP 4x4 automatic 21.2 MPG
11.1 l/100km
4.2 liter petrol engine
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 4.2 V8 390 HP 4x4 automatic 14.8 MPG
15.9 l/100km
4.4 liter petrol engine
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 4.4 V8 300 HP 4x4 automatic 15.8 MPG
14.9 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.