Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Land Rover Freelander 2000 fuel consumption

Land Rover Freelander from 2000 to 2002 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 11% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2000 the Land Rover Freelander average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersLand Rover FreelanderAll carmakersLand Rover Freelander
2000+4%insignificant+5%insignificant
Show all years
2001+5%insignificant+6%insignificant
2002+6%insignificant+7%insignificant

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Land Rover Freelander.

2000 - 2002

Land Rover Freelander 2000 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *insignificant
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Land Rover Freelander 2000 Station Wagon 1.8i 117 HP 4x4 manual 22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km
22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km+1%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Land Rover Freelander 2000 Station Wagon 2.0 Td4 112 HP 4x4 automatic 27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km-2%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Land Rover Freelander 2000 Station Wagon 2.5i V6 177 HP 4x4 automatic 19.0 MPG
12.4 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.