Ford Kuga 2016 fuel consumption

Ford Kuga from 2016 to 2019 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 30% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 27% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 34% higher. Starting from 2016 Ford Kuga average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2019 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

Year	Gasoline cars
Year	All carmakers	Ford Kuga
2016	+28%	+36%
Show all years
2017	+28%	+36%
2018	+28%	+36%
2019	+27%	+32%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford Kuga.

2016 - 2019

Ford Kuga 2016 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	29.2 MPG 8.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	22.1 MPG 10.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+36%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	47.4 MPG 5.0 l/100km

Ford Kuga 2016 specs Ford Kuga 2016 owner reviews

Ford Kuga 2016 automatic vs manual fuel consumption

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford Kuga 2016 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.1 liters per 100 km or 3% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Ford Kuga advertised fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is one of the worst.
Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford Kuga with 2.0 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Ford Kuga 2016 2.0 TDCI 180 Hp Automatic 4x4 180 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.5 liter petrol engine
Ford Kuga 2016 1.5 EcoBoost 4WD 150 Hp 150 HP automatic	29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km	22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km+33%
Ford Kuga 2016 1.5 EcoBoost 4WD 182 Hp 182 HP automatic	31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km	22.0 MPG 10.7 l/100km+45%
1.5 liter diesel engine
Ford Kuga 2016 1.5 TDCI 120 HP manual	53.5 MPG 4.4 l/100km
Ford Kuga 2016 1.5 TDCI Automatic 120 HP automatic	49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
Ford Kuga 2017 2.0 EcoBoost 242 HP 4x4 automatic	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Ford Kuga 2016 2.0 TDCI 150 Hp 150 HP manual	50.0 MPG 4.7 l/100km
Ford Kuga 2016 2.0 TDCI 150 Hp 4x4 150 HP manual	45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km
Ford Kuga 2016 2.0 TDCI 150 Hp Automatic 4x4 150 HP automatic	45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km
Ford Kuga 2016 2.0 TDCI 180 Hp 4x4 180 HP manual	45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km
Ford Kuga 2016 2.0 TDCI 180 Hp Automatic 4x4 180 HP automatic	45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km
2.5 liter petrol engine
Ford Kuga 2016 2.5 149 HP automatic	29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km	22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km+31%

Do you own a Ford Kuga? Please share your fuel economy!

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.