Ford Kuga 2013 fuel consumption

Ford Kuga from 2013 to 2016 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 30% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 27% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 34% higher. Starting from 2013 Ford Kuga average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2015 it was slightly above industry average, at 2016 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

Year	Gasoline cars		Diesel cars
Year	All carmakers	Ford Kuga	All carmakers	Ford Kuga
2013	+23%	+32%	+27%	+27%
Show all years
2014	+26%	+32%	+30%	+27%
2015	+27%	+32%	+33%	+27%
2016	+28%	+32%	+36%	+27%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford Kuga.

2013 - 2016

Ford Kuga 2013 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	32.1 MPG 7.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	24.9 MPG 9.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+32%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	30.4 MPG 7.7 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+27%

Ford Kuga 2013 specs Ford Kuga 2013 owner reviews

Ford Kuga 2013 automatic vs manual fuel consumption

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford Kuga 2013 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
According to user reports of real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford Kuga with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 7% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Ford Kuga advertised fuel economy is among the 20% worst in its class, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is one of the worst.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford Kuga 2013 2.0 TDCi 4WD 163 Hp 4x4 163 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford Kuga with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Ford Kuga 2013 1.6 EcoBoost 150 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Ford Kuga 2013 1.6 EcoBoost 150 HP manual	35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km	28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km+27%
Ford Kuga 2013 1.6 EcoBoost 4WD 150 Hp Automatic 4x4 150 HP automatic	30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km
Ford Kuga 2013 1.6 EcoBoost 4WD 182 Hp 182 HP automatic	30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km	22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km+36%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Ford Kuga 2013 2.0 TDCi 4WD 140 Hp 140 HP automatic	37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km	30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km+24%
Ford Kuga 2013 2.0 TDCi 4WD 163 Hp 4x4 163 HP manual	39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km	31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+27%
Ford Kuga 2013 2.0 TDCi 4WD 163 Hp Automatic 4x4 163 HP automatic	37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km	29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+29%

Do you own a Ford Kuga? Please share your fuel economy!

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.