Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Ford Galaxy fuel consumption

Of all Ford Galaxy modifications produced from 1995 to 2020 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 16% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 15% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 18% higher. Starting from 1995 Ford Galaxy average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2016 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became significantly higher than average. It should be noted that the gap between advertised and actual fuel economy changed quite significantly across the entire automotive industry during this period. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersFord GalaxyAll carmakersFord Galaxy
1995+5%-+2%+3%
Show all years
1996+4%-+2%+3%
1997+3%insignificant+3%+7%
1998+3%insignificant+4%+7%
1999+3%insignificant+5%+7%
2000+4%+5% +5%+8%
2001+5%+10% +6%+8%
2002+6%+10% +7%+8%
2003+6%+9% +8%+10%
2004+7%+9% +9%+11%
2005+8%+9% +10%+13%
2006+9%+9% +11%+13%
2007+11%+9% +12%+15%
2008+12%+9% +13%+15%
2009+14%+9% +14%+15%
2010+16%+20% +16%+23%
2011+19%+26% +19%+26%
2012+21%+26% +23%+26%
2013+23%+26% +27%+26%
2014+26%+26% +30%+26%
2015+27%+30% +33%+34%
2016+28%+35% +36%+41%
2017+28%+35% +38%+41%
2018+28%+35% +39%+41%
2019+28%+35% +37%+41%
2020+27%+35% +37%+41%

Select Ford Galaxy generation

For detailed fuel economy data, including advertised versus real-world fuel consumption and consumption differences between different engines and transmissions.

Ford Galaxy 2015 fuel economy Ford Galaxy 2010 - 2015 fuel economy Ford Galaxy 2006 - 2010 fuel economy Ford Galaxy 2003 - 2006 fuel economy Ford Galaxy 2000 - 2003 fuel economy Ford Galaxy 1995 - 2000 fuel economy
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.