Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Fiat Tipo 2016 fuel consumption

Fiat Tipo from 2016 to 2020 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 34% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 27% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 40% higher. Since 2016 the Fiat Tipo average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersFiat TipoAll carmakersFiat Tipo
2016+28%+24% +36%+29%
Show all years
2017+29%+24% +37%+29%
2018+28%+24% +38%+29%
2019+27%+21% +35%+29%
2020+26%+21% +34%+29%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Fiat Tipo.

2016 - 2020

Fiat Tipo 2016 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines31.6 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+24%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines56.7 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines44.0 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+29%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter diesel engine
Fiat Tipo 2016 1.2 95 HP manual 57.4 MPG
4.1 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+27%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Fiat Tipo 2016 1.4 95 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+21%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Fiat Tipo 2016 1.6 110 Hp 110 HP automatic 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+27%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Fiat Tipo 2016 1.6 120 Hp 120 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km+31%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.