Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Dacia Logan 2007 fuel consumption

Dacia Logan from 2007 to 2008 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 19% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 10% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 28% higher. Since 2007 the Dacia Logan average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersDacia Logan
2007+10%insignificant
Show all years
2008+12%insignificant

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Dacia Logan.

2007 - 2008

Dacia Logan 2007 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines30.8 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines45.5 MPG
5.2 l/100km
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Dacia Logan 2007 MCV 1.4 75 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km-3%
1.5 liter diesel engine
Dacia Logan 2007 MCV 1.5 dCi 68 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
Dacia Logan 2007 1.5 dCi 75 Hp 75 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
Dacia Logan 2007 1.5 dCi 90 Hp 90 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
1.6 liter petrol engine
Dacia Logan 2007 MCV 1.6 87 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+5%
Dacia Logan 2007 MCV 1.6 16V 105 HP manual 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+7%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.