Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Citroen C3 2005 fuel consumption

Citroen C3 from 2005 to 2010 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 21% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 22% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 20% higher. Starting from 2005 Citroen C3 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2009 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersCitroen C3All carmakersCitroen C3
2005+8%+20% +10%+9%
Show all years
2006+9%+19% +11%+3%
2007+11%+20% +12%+3%
2008+12%+20% +13%+3%
2009+14%+20% +14%+3%
2010+16%+20% +16%+3%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Citroen C3.

2005 - 2010

Citroen C3 2005 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines38.1 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines32.8 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+18%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines49.4 MPG
4.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines45.5 MPG
5.2 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+5%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Citroen C3 2005 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Citroen C3 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 7% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Citroen C3 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.4 diesel engine and manual transmission (Citroen C3 2007 1.4 HDi 68 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Citroen C3 with 1.4 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Citroen C3 2005 1.4 75 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Citroen C3 2005 1.1 61 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+12%
Citroen C3 2006 1.1 61 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+12%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Citroen C3 2005 1.4 75 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+13%
Citroen C3 2005 1.4 75 HP automatic 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+25%
Citroen C3 2007 1.4 75 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+13%
Citroen C3 2005 1.4 16V 90 HP automatic 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+17%
Citroen C3 2006 1.4 16V 90 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+18%
Citroen C3 2006 1.4 16V 90 HP automatic 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+22%
1.4 liter diesel engine
Citroen C3 2005 1.4 HDi 68 HP manual 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km+9%
Citroen C3 2006 1.4 68 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+7%
Citroen C3 2007 1.4 HDi 68 HP manual 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km+9%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Citroen C3 2005 1.6 16V 110 HP automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Citroen C3 2005 1.6 16V 110 HP automatic 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+34%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Citroen C3 2005 1.6 HDi 90 HP manual 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
Citroen C3 2005 1.6 HDi 109 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.