Chrysler Voyager fuel consumption
Of all Chrysler Voyager modifications produced from 1988 to 2007 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 4% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is similar to manufacturer's stated consumption, but for diesel engines is approximately 6% higher. Starting from 1990 Chrysler Voyager average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 1992 it was similar to average, at 1996 difference became less than industry average and finally at 2001 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Chrysler Voyager | All carmakers | Chrysler Voyager | |
| 1990 | +5% | insignificant | +5% | - |
| Show all years | ||||
| 1991 | +4% | insignificant | +4% | - |
| 1992 | +5% | insignificant | +2% | +6% |
| 1993 | +5% | insignificant | +3% | +6% |
| 1994 | +6% | - | +3% | +15% |
| 1995 | +5% | insignificant | +2% | +24% |
| 1996 | +4% | - | +2% | insignificant |
| 1997 | +3% | - | +3% | insignificant |
| 1998 | +3% | - | +4% | insignificant |
| 2001 | +5% | +10% | +6% | +4% |
| 2002 | +6% | +10% | +7% | +4% |
| 2003 | +6% | +10% | +8% | +4% |
| 2004 | +7% | +10% | +9% | +9% |
| 2005 | +8% | - | +10% | +13% |
| 2006 | +9% | - | +11% | +13% |
Select Chrysler Voyager generation
For detailed fuel economy data, including advertised versus real-world fuel consumption and consumption differences between different engines and transmissions.
Chrysler Voyager 2004 - 2007 fuel economy Chrysler Voyager 2001 - 2004 fuel economy Chrysler Voyager 1996 - 2001 fuel economy Chrysler Voyager 1991 - 1995 fuel economy Chrysler Voyager 1988 - 1991 fuel economy
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.