Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 fuel consumption
Chevrolet Tahoe from 2014 to 2020 real fuel consumption according to user reports is similar compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2014 the Chevrolet Tahoe average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Chevrolet Tahoe | |||
| 2014 | +26% | insignificant | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2015 | +27% | insignificant | ||
| 2016 | +28% | insignificant | ||
| 2017 | +29% | insignificant | ||
| 2018 | +28% | insignificant | ||
| 2019 | +27% | insignificant | ||
| 2020 | +26% | insignificant | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Chevrolet Tahoe.
2014 - 2020
Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 19.5 MPG 12.0 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 19.8 MPG 11.9 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 5.3 EcoTec V8 Automatic 355 HP automatic | 19.8 MPG 11.9 l/100km |
|
| Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 5.3 EcoTec V8 Automatic 4x4 355 HP automatic | 19.4 MPG 12.1 l/100km |
|
| 6.2 liter petrol engine | ||
| Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 6.2 426 HP 4x4 automatic | 19.4 MPG 12.1 l/100km |
19.8 MPG 11.9 l/100km-2% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.