Chevrolet Suburban 2006 fuel consumption
Chevrolet Suburban from 2006 to 2014 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 3% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2006 Chevrolet Suburban average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2008 it was similar to average, at 2010 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Chevrolet Suburban | |||
| 2006 | +9% | +13% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2007 | +10% | +13% | ||
| 2008 | +12% | +13% | ||
| 2009 | +13% | +13% | ||
| 2010 | +16% | +13% | ||
| 2011 | +19% | +13% | ||
| 2012 | +21% | +13% | ||
| 2013 | +23% | +13% | ||
| 2014 | +26% | +13% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Chevrolet Suburban.
2006 - 2014
Chevrolet Suburban 2006 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 18.0 MPG 13.1 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 16.0 MPG 14.7 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +13% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Chevrolet Suburban 2006 5.3 324 HP automatic | 18.2 MPG 12.9 l/100km |
16.0 MPG 14.7 l/100km+14% |
| Chevrolet Suburban 2006 5.3 4WD 324 HP automatic | 17.8 MPG 13.2 l/100km |
16.0 MPG 14.7 l/100km+11% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.