Chevrolet Camaro 2011 fuel consumption
Chevrolet Camaro from 2011 to 2013 real fuel consumption according to user reports is similar compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2011 the Chevrolet Camaro average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Chevrolet Camaro | |||
| 2011 | +19% | +10% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2012 | +21% | +10% | ||
| 2013 | +23% | +10% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Chevrolet Camaro.
2011 - 2013
Chevrolet Camaro 2011 cabrio fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 20.0 MPG 11.8 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 17.3 MPG 13.6 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +10% |
Chevrolet Camaro 2011 automatic vs manual fuel consumption
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Chevrolet Camaro 2011 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 4% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| CHEVROLET Camaro 2011 Convertible 3.6 V6 315 HP manual | 21.4 MPG 11.0 l/100km |
|
| CHEVROLET Camaro 2011 Convertible 3.6 V6 315 HP automatic | 22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km |
|
| 6.2 liter petrol engine | ||
| CHEVROLET Camaro 2011 Convertible 6.2 V8 405 HP automatic | 18.0 MPG 13.1 l/100km |
|
| Chevrolet Camaro 2011 SS 6.2 V8 430 HP manual | 19.0 MPG 12.4 l/100km |
17.3 MPG 13.6 l/100km+10% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.