Real fuel consumption and economy logo

BMW X5 2000 fuel consumption

BMW X5 from 2000 to 2003 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 21% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 17% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 25% higher. Since 2000 the BMW X5 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been slightly above industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersBMW X5All carmakersBMW X5
2000+4%+8% +5%-
Show all years
2001+5%+8% +6%+3%
2002+6%+8% +7%+3%
2003+6%+8% +8%+3%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of BMW X5.

2000 - 2003

BMW X5 2000 E53 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines17.1 MPG
13.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines17.7 MPG
13.3 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines24.4 MPG
9.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *insignificant

According to advertised fuel consumption, BMW X5 2000 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation BMW X5 with automatic transmission consumes around 2.2 litres per 100 km or 22% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the BMW X5 fuel economy is among the 20% worst in its class. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 3.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (BMW X5 2000 3.0i 231 HP 4x4). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has BMW X5 with 4.4 petrol engine and automatic transmission (BMW X5 2000 4.4i 286 HP 4x4), but despite this 90% of other similar cars have better fuel economy figures.

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.9 liter diesel engine
BMW X5 2001 2.9 3.0d 184 HP 4x4 manual 24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km
23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km+3%
BMW X5 2001 2.9 3.0d 184 HP 4x4 automatic 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+3%
3.0 liter petrol engine
BMW X5 2000 3.0i 231 HP 4x4 manual 18.1 MPG
13.0 l/100km
BMW X5 2000 3.0i 231 HP 4x4 automatic 18.1 MPG
13.0 l/100km
16.4 MPG
14.3 l/100km+10%
4.4 liter petrol engine
BMW X5 2000 4.4i 286 HP 4x4 automatic 16.8 MPG
14.0 l/100km
15.8 MPG
14.9 l/100km+6%
4.6 liter petrol engine
BMW X5 2002 4.6is 347 HP 4x4 automatic 15.7 MPG
15.0 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.