Real fuel consumption and economy logo

BMW 6 series 2007 fuel consumption

BMW 6 series from 2007 to 2011 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 34% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 25% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 44% higher. Starting from 2007 BMW 6 series average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2008 it was slightly above industry average, at 2010 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersBMW 6 seriesAll carmakersBMW 6 series
2007+11%+17% +12%+25%
Show all years
2008+12%+17% +13%+25%
2009+14%+17% +14%+25%
2010+16%+17% +16%+25%
2011+19%+17% +19%+25%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of BMW 6 series.

2007 - 2011

BMW 6 series 2007 coupe fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines24.9 MPG
9.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines18.2 MPG
12.9 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+23%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+28%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a BMW 6 series 2007 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 7% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the BMW 6 series advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has BMW 6 series with 4.8 petrol engine and automatic transmission (BMW 650i 367 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
3.0 liter petrol engine
BMW 630i 272 HP manual 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
BMW 630i 272 HP automatic 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
3.0 liter diesel engine
BMW 635d 286 HP automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km+28%
4.8 liter petrol engine
BMW 650i 367 HP manual 20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km
BMW 650i 367 HP automatic 22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km
18.2 MPG
12.9 l/100km+23%
2007 - 2011

BMW 6 series 2007 cabrio fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines21.3 MPG
11.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines18.2 MPG
12.9 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+10%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+22%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a BMW 6 series 2007 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.5 liters per 100 km or 3% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has BMW 6 series with 4.8 petrol engine and automatic transmission (BMW 650i Cabrio 367 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
3.0 liter petrol engine
BMW 630i Cabrio 272 HP manual 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
BMW 630i Cabrio 272 HP automatic 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
3.0 liter diesel engine
BMW 635d Cabrio 286 HP automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km+22%
4.8 liter petrol engine
BMW 650i Cabrio 367 HP manual 18.2 MPG
12.9 l/100km
BMW 650i Cabrio 367 HP automatic 20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km
18.2 MPG
12.9 l/100km+10%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.