Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volvo 940 fuel consumption

Of all Volvo 940 modifications produced from 1990 to 1997 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 7% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 1990 Volvo 940 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 1993 it was similar to average, at 1995 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersVolvo 940All carmakersVolvo 940
1990+5%+9% +5%+6%
Show all years
1991+4%+9% +4%+6%
1992+5%+9% +2%+6%
1993+5%+4% +3%+6%
1994+6%+6% +3%+6%
1995+5%+7% +2%+6%
1996+4%+7% +2%+6%
1997+3%+7% +3%-

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Volvo 940.

1996 - 1997

Volvo 940 1996 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines21.2 MPG
11.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+7%

Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volvo 940 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.9 litres per 100 km or 9% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Volvo 940 advertised fuel economy is average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.3 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Volvo 940 1996 Polar 2.3 Automatic 135 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.3 liter petrol engine
Volvo 940 1996 Polar 2.3 135 HP manual 22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km
Volvo 940 1996 Polar 2.3 Automatic 135 HP automatic 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
Volvo 940 1996 Polar 2.3 T 165 HP manual 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km+7%
Volvo 940 1996 Polar 2.3 T Automatic 165 HP automatic 18.2 MPG
12.9 l/100km
1990 - 1996

Volvo 940 1990 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines23.7 MPG
9.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines21.5 MPG
11.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+8%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines30.4 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines28.2 MPG
8.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+6%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volvo 940 1990 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 4% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volvo 940 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 4% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Volvo 940 advertised fuel economy is slightly worse than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.3 petrol engine and manual transmission (Volvo 940 1990 2.3i Estate 131 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volvo 940 with 2.3 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Volvo 940 1994 2.3i Estate 116 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volvo 940 1990 2.0i Estate 112 HP manual 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+4%
Volvo 940 1992 2.0i Turbo Estate 190 HP manual 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
2.3 liter petrol engine
Volvo 940 1994 2.3i Estate 116 HP manual 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
Volvo 940 1994 2.3i Estate 116 HP automatic 23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km
Volvo 940 1990 2.3i Estate 131 HP manual 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km0%
Volvo 940 1990 2.3i Estate 131 HP automatic 22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km
21.2 MPG
11.1 l/100km+6%
Volvo 940 1994 2.3i Turbo Estate 135 HP manual 24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km
21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km+13%
Volvo 940 1994 2.3i Turbo Estate 135 HP automatic 22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km+4%
Volvo 940 1990 2.3 16V Estate 155 HP manual 23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
Volvo 940 1990 2.3 Turbo Estate 165 HP manual 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km+21%
Volvo 940 1990 2.3 Turbo Estate 165 HP automatic 19.4 MPG
12.1 l/100km
2.4 liter diesel engine
Volvo 940 1992 2.4 Diesel Estate 82 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Volvo 940 1990 2.4 Turbo Diesel Estate 109 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Volvo 940 1990 2.4 Turbo Diesel I.c. Estate 122 HP manual 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+2%
Volvo 940 1990 2.4 Turbo Diesel I.c. Estate 122 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+9%
1990 - 1996

Volvo 940 1990 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines23.7 MPG
9.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines21.5 MPG
11.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+7%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines28.2 MPG
8.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+6%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Volvo 940 1990 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volvo 940 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.6 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Volvo 940 advertised fuel economy is slightly worse than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.3 petrol engine and manual transmission (Volvo 940 1990 2.3i 131 Hp 131 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volvo 940 with 2.3 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Volvo 940 1994 2.3i 116 Hp Automatic 116 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volvo 940 1990 2.0i 112 HP manual 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+5%
Volvo 940 1992 2.0i Turbo 155 HP manual 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
2.3 liter petrol engine
Volvo 940 1994 2.3i 116 Hp 116 HP manual 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
Volvo 940 1994 2.3i 116 Hp Automatic 116 HP automatic 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
Volvo 940 1990 2.3i 131 Hp 131 HP manual 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km+7%
Volvo 940 1990 2.3i 131 Hp Automatic 131 HP automatic 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
21.0 MPG
11.2 l/100km+10%
Volvo 940 1995 2.3i Turbo Automatic 135 HP automatic 22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km+3%
Volvo 940 1990 2.3 16V 155 HP manual 23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
Volvo 940 1990 2.3 Turbo 165 HP manual 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km+21%
Volvo 940 1990 2.3 Turbo Automatic 165 HP automatic 19.4 MPG
12.1 l/100km
2.4 liter diesel engine
Volvo 940 1992 2.4 Diesel 82 HP manual 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Volvo 940 1990 2.4 Turbo Diesel 109 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Volvo 940 1990 2.4 Turbo Diesel I.c. 122 HP manual 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+4%
Volvo 940 1990 2.4 Turbo Diesel I.c. Automatic 122 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+9%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.