Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volkswagen T-Roc fuel consumption

Of all Volkswagen T-Roc modifications produced from 2017 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 26% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 27% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 25% higher. Since 2017 the Volkswagen T-Roc average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersVolkswagen T-RocAll carmakersVolkswagen T-Roc
2017+28%+29% +38%+24%
Show all years
2018+28%+28% +39%+24%
2019+28%+26% +37%+24%
2020+27%+24% +37%-
2021+26%+24% +37%-
2017 - 2021

Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines42.4 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines32.8 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+27%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines49.3 MPG
4.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines39.1 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+25%

Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen T-Roc with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 4% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Volkswagen T-Roc fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.6 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 1.6 TDI 116 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen T-Roc with 1.6 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen T-Roc 2020 1.6 TDI SCR 116 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen T-Roc 2020 1.0 TSI 110 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+19%
Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 1.0 TSI 115 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+27%
1.5 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 1.5 TSI 150 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+28%
Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 1.5 TSI 150 HP automatic 43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+37%
Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 1.5 TSI 150 HP 4x4 automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 1.5 TSI 150 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+27%
Volkswagen T-Roc 2020 1.5 TSI 150 HP automatic 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
1.6 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 1.6 TDI 116 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+26%
Volkswagen T-Roc 2020 1.6 TDI SCR 116 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km+28%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 2.0 TSI 4Motion 190 HP 4x4 automatic 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+22%
Volkswagen T-Roc 2019 R 2.0 TSI 300 HP 4x4 automatic 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 2.0 TDI 150 HP 4x4 manual 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 2.0 TDI 150 HP 4x4 automatic 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+24%
Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 2.0 TDI SCR 150 HP manual 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+26%
Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 2.0 TDI SCR 150 HP 4x4 manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+20%
Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 2.0 TDI SCR 150 HP 4x4 automatic 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 2.0 TDI SCR 150 HP automatic 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
Volkswagen T-Roc 2020 2.0 TDI SCR 150 HP 4x4 automatic 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
Volkswagen T-Roc 2020 2.0 TDI SCR 150 HP automatic 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 2.0 TDI 190 HP 4x4 automatic 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.