Volkswagen EOS fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Volkswagen EOS | All carmakers | Volkswagen EOS | |
| 2006 | +9% | +12% | +11% | insignificant |
| Show all years | ||||
| 2007 | +11% | +12% | +12% | insignificant |
| 2008 | +12% | +12% | +13% | insignificant |
| 2009 | +14% | +12% | +14% | insignificant |
| 2010 | +16% | +12% | +16% | insignificant |
| 2011 | +19% | +13% | +19% | +13% |
| 2012 | +21% | +14% | +23% | +23% |
| 2013 | +23% | +14% | +27% | +23% |
| 2014 | +26% | +14% | +30% | +23% |
| 2015 | +27% | +14% | +33% | +23% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Volkswagen EOS.
Volkswagen EOS 2011 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.0 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +14% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +23% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volkswagen EOS 2011 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 6% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen EOS with automatic transmission consumes around 0.8 litres per 100 km or 10% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Eos 2011 2.0 TSI 210 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen EOS with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Eos 2011 2.0 TDI 140 Hp 140 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Volkswagen Eos 2011 1.4 TSI 122 Hp 122 HP manual | 37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km+13% |
| Volkswagen Eos 2011 1.4 TSI 160 Hp 160 HP manual | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km+6% |
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Volkswagen Eos 2011 2.0 TSI 210 HP manual | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km+15% |
| Volkswagen Eos 2011 2.0 TDI 210 Hp Automatic 210 HP automatic | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
26.1 MPG 9.0 l/100km+20% |
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Volkswagen Eos 2011 2.0 TDI 140 Hp 140 HP manual | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km+23% |
Volkswagen EOS 2006 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.3 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +9% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 36.5 MPG 6.5 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | insignificant |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volkswagen EOS 2006 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen EOS with automatic transmission consumes around 1.2 litres per 100 km or 15% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Volkswagen EOS fuel economy is slightly better than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Eos 2006 2.0 TDI 140 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen EOS with 3.6 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Volkswagen EOS 2009 3.6 FSI V6 260 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Volkswagen EOS 2007 1.4 TSI 122 Hp 122 HP manual | 36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km |
|
| Volkswagen EOS 2009 1.4 TSI 122 Hp 122 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
|
| Volkswagen EOS 2008 1.4 TSI 160 Hp 160 HP manual | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
|
| Volkswagen EOS 2009 1.4 TSI 160 Hp 160 HP manual | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
|
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Volkswagen Eos 2006 1.6 16V FSI 116 HP manual | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km+7% |
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Volkswagen Eos 2006 2.0 16V FSI 150 HP manual | 27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km |
27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km0% |
| Volkswagen Eos 2006 2.0 16V Turbo FSI 200 HP manual | 28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km |
26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km+7% |
| Volkswagen Eos 2006 2.0 16V Turbo FSI Automatic 200 HP automatic | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
21.8 MPG 10.8 l/100km+32% |
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Volkswagen Eos 2006 2.0 TDI 140 HP manual | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km+2% |
| Volkswagen Eos 2006 2.0 TDI Automatic 140 HP automatic | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km0% |
| 3.2 liter petrol engine | ||
| Volkswagen Eos 2006 3.2 V6 250 HP automatic | 25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km |
|
| 3.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Volkswagen EOS 2009 3.6 FSI V6 260 HP automatic | 25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.