Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Peugeot Bipper fuel consumption

Of all Peugeot Bipper modifications produced from 2009 to 2015 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 24% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 17% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 31% higher. Starting from 2009 Peugeot Bipper average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2010 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersPeugeot BipperAll carmakersPeugeot Bipper
2009+13%+17% +14%-
Show all years
2010+16%+17% +16%+31%
2011+18%-+20%+31%
2012+20%-+23%+31%
2013+23%-+27%+31%
2014+26%-+30%+31%
2015+27%-+33%+31%
2009 - 2015

Peugeot Bipper 2009 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+17%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+31%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter diesel engine
Peugeot Bipper 2010 1.2 1.3 HDi 75 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+31%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Peugeot Bipper 2009 Tepee 1.4 75 HP manual 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+17%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.