Peugeot 406 fuel consumption

Of all Peugeot 406 modifications produced from 1999 to 2004 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 5% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 4% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 6% higher. Starting from 2000 Peugeot 406 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 2002 it was slightly above industry average, at 2003 difference became similar to average and finally at 2004 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

Year	Gasoline cars		Diesel cars
Year	All carmakers	Peugeot 406	All carmakers	Peugeot 406
2000	+4%	insignificant	+5%	insignificant
Show all years
2001	+5%	insignificant	+6%	insignificant
2002	+5%	+7%	+7%	+6%
2003	+6%	+7%	+8%	+7%
2004	+7%	+5%	+9%	+7%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Peugeot 406.

2002 - 2004

Peugeot 406 2002 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	27.8 MPG 8.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	26.0 MPG 9.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+7%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	38.9 MPG 6.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+9%

Peugeot 406 2002 specs

Peugeot 406 2002 automatic vs manual fuel consumption

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 406 2002 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Peugeot 406 with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 406 2002 2.0-16V HPI 143 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.7 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 2002 1.7 1.8-16V 117 HP manual	30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km	27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km+12%
Peugeot 406 2002 1.7 1.8-16V Automatic 117 HP automatic	28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 2002 2.0-16V 138 HP manual	28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+5%
Peugeot 406 2002 2.0-16V Automatic 138 HP automatic	27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km
Peugeot 406 2002 2.0-16V HPI 143 HP manual	31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km	26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km+17%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 406 2002 2.0 HDI 90 Hp 90 HP manual	41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km
Peugeot 406 2002 2.0 HDI 110 Hp 110 HP manual	42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km
Peugeot 406 2002 2.0 HDI 110 Hp Automatic 110 HP automatic	36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km+9%
2.2 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 2002 2.2-16V 160 HP manual	26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km	26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km+1%
2.2 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 406 2002 2.2 HDI 136 HP manual	36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km	34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km+8%
2.9 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 2003 2.9 3.0-24V V6 210 HP automatic	23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km	23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km+2%

Do you own a Peugeot 406? Please share your fuel economy!

2002 - 2004

Peugeot 406 2002 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	27.3 MPG 8.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	26.0 MPG 9.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+6%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+6%

Peugeot 406 2002 specs

Peugeot 406 2002 automatic vs manual fuel consumption

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 406 2002 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Peugeot 406 with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 406 2002 Break 2.0-16V HPI 143 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.7 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 2002 1.7 Break 1.8-16V 117 HP manual	29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km	27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km+9%
Peugeot 406 2002 1.7 Break 1.8-16V Automatic 117 HP automatic	27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 2002 Break 2.0-16V 138 HP manual	28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+4%
Peugeot 406 2002 Break 2.0-16V Automatic 138 HP automatic	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km
Peugeot 406 2002 Break 2.0-16V HPI 143 HP manual	30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km	26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km+14%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 406 2002 Break 2.0 HDI 90 Hp 90 HP manual	39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km
Peugeot 406 2002 Break 2.0 HDI 110 Hp 110 HP manual	41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km
Peugeot 406 2002 Break 2.0 HDI 110 Hp Automatic 110 HP automatic	35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km+6%
2.2 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 2002 Break 2.2-16V 160 HP manual	26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km	26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km+1%
2.2 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 406 2002 Break 2.2 HDI 136 HP manual	36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km	34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km+6%
2.9 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 2003 2.9 Break 3.0-24V V6 210 HP automatic	23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km	23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km0%

Do you own a Peugeot 406? Please share your fuel economy!

1999 - 2002

Peugeot 406 1999 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	26.2 MPG 9.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	38.9 MPG 6.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	insignificant

Peugeot 406 1999 specs Peugeot 406 1999 owner reviews

Peugeot 406 1999 automatic vs manual fuel consumption

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 406 1999 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Peugeot 406 with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 406 2001 2.0-16V HPI 143 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.7 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 2001 1.7 1.8-16V 116 Hp 116 HP manual	30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km
Peugeot 406 2001 1.7 1.8-16V 117 Hp 117 HP automatic	28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km
1.8 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 1999 1.8 90 HP manual	28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km
Peugeot 406 1999 1.8-16V 112 Hp 112 HP manual	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km
Peugeot 406 1999 1.8-16V 112 Hp Automatic 112 HP automatic	26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 1999 2.0-16V 138 HP manual	28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km
Peugeot 406 1999 2.0-16V Automatic 138 HP automatic	27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km
Peugeot 406 2001 2.0-16V HPI 143 HP manual	31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 406 1999 2.0 HDI 90 Hp 90 HP manual	41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km
Peugeot 406 1999 2.0 HDI 110 Hp 110 HP manual	42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km
Peugeot 406 2001 2.0 HDI 110 Hp Automatic 110 HP automatic	36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km
2.2 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 2000 2.2-16V 160 HP manual	26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km	27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km-2%
2.2 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 406 2000 2.2 HDI 136 HP manual	36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km	36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km+2%
2.9 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 406 1999 2.9 3.0-24V V6 194 Hp 194 HP manual	21.6 MPG 10.9 l/100km
Peugeot 406 1999 2.9 3.0-24V V6 194 Hp Automatic 194 HP automatic	21.4 MPG 11.0 l/100km
Peugeot 406 2000 2.9 3.0-24V V6 210 Hp 210 HP manual	24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km
Peugeot 406 2000 2.9 3.0-24V V6 210 Hp Automatic 210 HP automatic	23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km

Do you own a Peugeot 406? Please share your fuel economy!

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.