Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Peugeot 306 fuel consumption

Of all Peugeot 306 modifications produced from 1999 to 2002 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 2% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is similar to manufacturer's stated consumption, but for diesel engines is approximately 6% higher. Since 1999 the Peugeot 306 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersPeugeot 306All carmakersPeugeot 306
1999+3%insignificant+5%+12%
Show all years
2000+4%insignificant+5%+12%
2001+5%insignificant+6%+12%
2002+6%-+7%+12%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Peugeot 306.

1999 - 2001

Peugeot 306 1999 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+6%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 306 1999 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Peugeot 306 fuel economy is slightly better than average. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 306 2001 1.6 98 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 306 1999 1.4 75 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km-1%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 306 1999 1.6 90 HP manual 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km0%
Peugeot 306 1999 1.6 90 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Peugeot 306 2001 1.6 98 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km-1%
Peugeot 306 2001 1.6 98 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
1.8 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 306 1999 1.8 16V 112 HP manual 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km-2%
1.9 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 306 1999 1.9 d 70 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km0%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 306 1999 2.0 16V 135 HP manual 25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km
25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km+2%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 306 1999 2.0 HDI 90 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+12%
1999 - 2002

Peugeot 306 1999 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines31.3 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines32.4 MPG
7.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+6%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 306 1999 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 306 2001 Break 1.6 98 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 306 1999 Break 1.4 75 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km-1%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 306 1999 Break 1.6 90 HP manual 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km0%
Peugeot 306 1999 Break 1.6 90 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Peugeot 306 2001 Break 1.6 98 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+1%
Peugeot 306 2001 Break 1.6 98 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
1.8 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 306 1999 Break 1.8 16V 112 HP manual 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+4%
1.9 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 306 1999 Break 1.9d 70 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km0%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 306 1999 Break 2.0 HDI 90 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+12%
1999 - 2001

Peugeot 306 1999 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines32.8 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+6%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 306 1999 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 306 2001 1.6 98 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 306 1999 1.4 75 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+7%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 306 1999 1.6 90 HP manual 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km0%
Peugeot 306 1999 1.6 90 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Peugeot 306 2001 1.6 98 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km-1%
Peugeot 306 2001 1.6 98 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
1.8 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 306 1999 1.8 16V 112 HP manual 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+5%
1.9 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 306 1999 1.9 d 70 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km0%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 306 1999 2.0 HDI 90 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+12%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.