Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Opel Karl fuel consumption

Of all Opel Karl modifications produced from 2015 to 2018 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 38% higher compared to advertised consumption. Since 2015 the Opel Karl average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersOpel Karl
2015+27%+38%
Show all years
2016+28%+38%
2017+28%+38%
2018+28%+38%
2015 - 2018

Opel Karl 2015 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines38.9 MPG
6.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+38%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Opel Karl 2015 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 4% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Opel Karl with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 9% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Opel Karl advertised fuel economy is one of the best, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Opel Karl 2015 1.0 75 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+29%
Opel Karl 2015 1.0 75 HP automatic 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+47%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.