Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Nissan Cube fuel consumption

Of all Nissan Cube modifications produced from 1998 to 2019 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 12% higher compared to advertised consumption. Since 2010 the Nissan Cube average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersNissan Cube
2010+16%+12%
Show all years
2011+19%+12%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Nissan Cube.

2008 - 2019

Nissan Cube 2008 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines30.6 MPG
7.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+12%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Nissan Cube 2008 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.1 liters per 100 km or 2% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Nissan Cube with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Nissan Cube 2010 1.6 110 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.5 liter petrol engine
Nissan Cube 2008 1.5 109 HP 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
1.5 liter diesel engine
Nissan Cube 2010 1.5 dCi 110 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
1.6 liter petrol engine
Nissan Cube 2010 1.6 110 HP manual 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+12%
Nissan Cube 2010 1.6 110 HP automatic 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
1.8 liter petrol engine
Nissan Cube 2009 1.8 122 HP manual 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
Nissan Cube 2009 1.8 122 HP automatic 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.