Nissan 200 SX fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Nissan 200 SX | |||
| 1990 | +5% | +10% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 1991 | +4% | +10% | ||
| 1992 | +5% | +10% | ||
| 1993 | +5% | +10% | ||
| 1994 | +6% | +19% | ||
| 1995 | +5% | +19% | ||
| 1996 | +4% | +19% | ||
| 1997 | +3% | +21% | ||
| 1998 | +3% | +23% | ||
| 1999 | +3% | +23% | ||
| 2000 | +4% | +23% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Nissan 200 SX.
Nissan 200 SX 1997 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 26.6 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 21.8 MPG 10.8 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +23% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, Nissan 200 SX 1997 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Nissan 200 SX advertised fuel economy is one of the best, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Nissan 200 SX 1997 2.0 Turbo 200 HP manual | 26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km |
21.8 MPG 10.8 l/100km+23% |
| Nissan 200 SX 1997 2.0 Turbo 200 HP automatic | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
|
Nissan 200 SX 1994 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 26.0 MPG 9.1 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +19% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Nissan 200 SX 1994 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.5 liters per 100 km or 6% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Nissan 200 SX advertised fuel economy is among the best, beating more than 80% of other cars, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Nissan 200 SX 1994 2.0 Turbo 200 HP manual | 26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km |
22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km+19% |
| Nissan 200 SX 1994 2.0 Turbo 200 HP automatic | 25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km |
|
Nissan 200 SX 1988 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +10% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, Nissan 200 SX 1988 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Nissan 200 SX advertised fuel economy is slightly better than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is one of the worst.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
| Nissan 200 SX 1988 1.8 Turbo 169 HP manual | 25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km |
23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km+10% |
| Nissan 200 SX 1988 1.8 Turbo 169 HP automatic | 25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.