Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mazda RX-8 fuel consumption

Of all Mazda RX-8 modifications produced from 2003 to 2012 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 12% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 2003 Mazda RX-8 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2008 it was slightly above industry average, at 2009 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersMazda RX-8
2003+6%+20%
Show all years
2004+7%+20%
2005+8%+20%
2006+9%+20%
2007+11%+20%
2008+12%+14%
2009+14%+3%
2010+16%+3%
2011+19%+3%
2012+21%+3%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mazda RX-8.

2008 - 2012

Mazda RX-8 2008 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines18.7 MPG
12.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines18.0 MPG
13.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+3%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.3 liter petrol engine
Mazda RX-8 2008 1.3 Wankel 212 HP automatic 18.8 MPG
12.5 l/100km
Mazda RX-8 2008 1.3 Wankel 232 HP manual 18.5 MPG
12.7 l/100km
18.0 MPG
13.1 l/100km+3%
2003 - 2009

Mazda RX-8 2003 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines21.2 MPG
11.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines17.6 MPG
13.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+20%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.3 liter petrol engine
Mazda RX-8 2003 1.3 Renesis 192 HP manual 21.8 MPG
10.8 l/100km
18.1 MPG
13.0 l/100km+20%
Mazda RX-8 2005 1.3 Wankel 215 HP automatic 21.8 MPG
10.8 l/100km
Mazda RX-8 2003 1.3 Renesis HP 231 HP manual 20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km
17.2 MPG
13.7 l/100km+20%
Mazda RX-8 1.3 250 HP manual 20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.