Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mazda MX-6 fuel consumption

Of all Mazda MX-6 modifications produced from 1991 to 2000 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 8% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 1991 Mazda MX-6 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 1997 it was significantly higher than average, at 2000 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersMazda MX-6
1991+4%+9%
Show all years
1992+5%+9%
1993+5%+9%
1994+6%+9%
1995+5%+9%
1996+4%+9%
1997+3%+9%
1998+3%+9%
1999+3%+9%
2000+4%+9%
1991 - 2000

Mazda MX-6 1991 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+8%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda MX-6 1991 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 3% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mazda MX-6 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda MX-6 with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda MX-6 1991 2.0i 116 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mazda MX-6 1991 2.0i 116 HP manual 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km+13%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Mazda MX-6 1991 2.5iV6 167 HP manual 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km+4%
Mazda MX-6 1991 2.5iV6 Automatic 167 HP automatic 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.