Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mazda MPV fuel consumption

Of all Mazda MPV modifications produced from 1990 to 2005 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is similar compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is similar to manufacturer's stated consumption, but for diesel engines is approximately 13% higher. Since 2003 the Mazda MPV average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearDiesel cars
All carmakersMazda MPV
2003+8%+13%
Show all years
2004+9%+13%
2005+10%+13%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mazda MPV.

2003 - 2005

Mazda MPV 2003 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+13%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter diesel engine
Mazda MPV 2003 2.0 CiTD 136 HP manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+13%
2.3 liter petrol engine
Mazda MPV 2003 2.3 141 HP manual 23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
1999 - 2002

Mazda MPV 1999 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mazda MPV 1999 2.0 122 HP manual 23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km-2%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Mazda MPV 1999 2.5 24V 170 HP automatic 21.2 MPG
11.1 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.