Mazda CX-30 fuel consumption
Of all Mazda CX-30 modifications produced from 2019 to 2023 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 21% higher compared to advertised consumption. Since 2019 the Mazda CX-30 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Mazda CX-30 | All carmakers | Mazda CX-30 | |
| 2019 | +25% | +21% | +33% | +20% |
| Show all years | ||||
| 2020 | +22% | +21% | +31% | +20% |
| 2021 | +20% | +21% | +27% | +20% |
| 2022 | +18% | +16% | +24% | - |
| 2023 | +16% | +16% | +22% | - |
2019
Mazda CX-30 2019 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 41.7 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 34.5 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +21% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 50.0 MPG 4.7 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +20% |
Mazda CX-30 2019 automatic vs manual fuel consumption
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda CX-30 2019 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.5 liters per 100 km or 9% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda CX-30 with 2.5 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Mazda CX-30 2019 2.5 Skyactiv-G 189 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8 liter diesel engine | ||
| Mazda CX-30 2019 1.8 Skyactiv-D 116 HP manual | 53.5 MPG 4.4 l/100km |
44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km+20% |
| Mazda CX-30 2019 1.8 Skyactiv-D Automatic 116 HP automatic | 47.0 MPG 5.0 l/100km |
|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 Skyactiv-G 122 HP 4x4 manual | 44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km |
36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km+23% |
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 Skyactiv-G 122 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
|
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 Skyactiv-G Automatic 122 HP 4x4 automatic | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
|
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 Skyactiv-G Automatic 122 HP automatic | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km+20% |
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 e-Skyactiv G 150 HP manual | 39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km+14% |
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 e-Skyactiv G 150 HP 4x4 manual | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
|
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 e-Skyactiv G Automatic 150 HP automatic | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
|
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 e-Skyactiv G Automatic 150 HP 4x4 automatic | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km+18% |
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 Skyactiv-X 180 HP 4x4 manual | 48.0 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km+43% |
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 Skyactiv-X 180 HP manual | 51.1 MPG 4.6 l/100km |
|
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 Skyactiv-X Automatic 180 HP 4x4 automatic | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
|
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 Skyactiv-X Automatic 180 HP automatic | 45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
|
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 e-Skyactiv X 186 HP manual | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
|
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 e-Skyactiv X 186 HP 4x4 manual | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+11% |
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 e-Skyactiv X Automatic 186 HP automatic | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km+15% |
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.0 e-Skyactiv X Automatic 186 HP 4x4 automatic | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
|
| 2.5 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mazda CX-30 2019 2.5 Skyactiv-G 189 HP automatic | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.