Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Lexus CT fuel consumption

Of all Lexus CT modifications produced from 2011 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 55% higher compared to advertised consumption. Since 2011 the Lexus CT average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersLexus CT
2011+19%+53%
Show all years
2012+21%+53%
2013+23%+53%
2014+26%+57%
2015+27%+61%
2016+28%+61%
2017+28%+61%
2018+28%+56%
2019+28%+50%
2020+27%+50%
2021+26%+50%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Lexus CT.

2018

Lexus CT 2018 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines65.3 MPG
3.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+50%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Lexus CT 2018 1.8 200h Hybrid 99 HP automatic 65.3 MPG
3.6 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+50%
2014 - 2018

Lexus CT 2014 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines65.3 MPG
3.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+61%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Lexus CT 2014 1.8 99 HP automatic 65.3 MPG
3.6 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+61%
2011 - 2014

Lexus CT 2011 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines61.9 MPG
3.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+53%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Lexus CT 2011 1.8 16V 99 HP automatic 61.9 MPG
3.8 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+53%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.