Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Land Rover Range Rover Velar fuel consumption

Of all Land Rover Range Rover Velar modifications produced from 2017 to 2023 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 22% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Velar average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 2020 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearDiesel cars
All carmakersLand Rover Range Rover Velar
2017+36%+26%
Show all years
2018+36%+26%
2019+33%+26%
2020+31%+28%
2021+27%+31%
2022+24%+31%
2023+22%+31%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Land Rover Range Rover Velar.

2023

Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines23.4 MPG
10.1 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines32.0 MPG
7.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+9%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023 2.0 P250 250 HP 4x4 automatic 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023 2.0 D200 204 HP 4x4 automatic 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
3.0 liter petrol engine
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023 3.0 P400 400 HP 4x4 automatic 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
3.0 liter diesel engine
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023 3.0 D300 300 HP 4x4 automatic 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+9%
2020 - 2023

Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines30.0 MPG
7.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+31%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020 2.0 P250 250 HP 4x4 automatic 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020 2.0 D200 204 HP 4x4 automatic 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020 2.0 D200 204 HP 4x4 automatic 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+45%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020 3.0 P400 400 HP 4x4 automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
3.0 liter diesel engine
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020 3.0 D300 300 HP 4x4 automatic 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020 3.0 D300 300 HP 4x4 automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+16%
2017 - 2020

Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines40.1 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+27%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 2.0 P250 250 HP 4x4 automatic 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 2.0 D180 180 HP 4x4 automatic 43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+37%
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 2.0 D240 S 240 HP 4x4 automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+22%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 3.0 P380 380 HP 4x4 automatic 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
3.0 liter diesel engine
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 3.0 D300 300 HP 4x4 automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+20%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.