Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Hyundai Grandeur fuel consumption

Of all Hyundai Grandeur modifications produced from 2005 to 2019 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 11% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 2005 Hyundai Grandeur average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2007 it was similar to average, at 2008 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. It is noteworthy during this period that the gap between advertised and actual fuel economy changed significantly throughout the automotive industry. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersHyundai Grandeur
2005+8%+11%
Show all years
2006+9%+11%
2007+11%+11%
2008+12%+11%
2009+14%+11%
2010+16%+11%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Hyundai Grandeur.

2005 - 2010

Hyundai Grandeur 2005 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines23.4 MPG
10.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+11%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.2 liter diesel engine
Hyundai Grandeur 2006 2.2 CRDi VGT 155 HP automatic 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
2.7 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Grandeur 2007 2.7 V6 192 HP automatic 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
3.3 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Grandeur 2005 3.3i V6 235 HP automatic 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km+11%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.