Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Hyundai Getz fuel consumption

Of all Hyundai Getz modifications produced from 2002 to 2009 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 14% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 20% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 7% higher. Since 2002 the Hyundai Getz average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersHyundai GetzAll carmakersHyundai Getz
2002+6%+21% +7%-
Show all years
2003+6%+21% +8%-
2004+7%+21% +9%-
2005+8%+20% +10%+24%
2006+9%+20% +11%+24%
2007+11%+20% +12%+24%
2008+12%+20% +13%+24%
2009+14%+20% +14%+24%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Hyundai Getz.

2005 - 2009

Hyundai Getz 2005 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines32.1 MPG
7.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+19%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+24%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Hyundai Getz 2005 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Hyundai Getz with automatic transmission consumes around 0.2 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Hyundai Getz advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Hyundai Getz 2005 1.6i 106 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Getz 2005 1.1i 66 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+15%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Getz 2005 1.4i 97 HP manual 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+21%
Hyundai Getz 2005 1.4i Automatic 97 HP automatic 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+18%
1.5 liter diesel engine
Hyundai Getz 2005 1.5 CRDi VGT 88 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+24%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Getz 2005 1.6i 106 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+25%
Hyundai Getz 2005 1.6i Automatic 106 HP automatic 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
2005 - 2009

Hyundai Getz 2005 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines32.1 MPG
7.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+19%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+24%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Hyundai Getz 2005 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Hyundai Getz with automatic transmission consumes around 0.2 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Hyundai Getz advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Hyundai Getz 2005 1.6i 106 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Getz 2005 1.1i 66 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+15%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Getz 2005 1.4i 97 HP manual 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+21%
Hyundai Getz 2005 1.4i 97 HP automatic 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+18%
1.5 liter diesel engine
Hyundai Getz 2005 1.5 CRDi VGT 88 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+24%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Getz 2005 1.6i 106 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+25%
Hyundai Getz 2005 1.6i 106 HP automatic 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
2002 - 2005

Hyundai Getz 2002 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines31.9 MPG
7.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+20%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *insignificant

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Hyundai Getz 2002 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.1 liters per 100 km or 17% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Hyundai Getz advertised fuel economy is slightly better than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Hyundai Getz 2002 1.6i 105 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Getz 2002 1.1i 62 HP manual 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+19%
1.3 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Getz 2002 1.3i 82 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+20%
1.5 liter diesel engine
Hyundai Getz 2003 1.5 CRDi 82 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km-2%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Getz 2002 1.6i 105 HP manual 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+22%
Hyundai Getz 2002 1.6i 105 HP automatic 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
2002 - 2005

Hyundai Getz 2002 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines35.7 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines31.9 MPG
7.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+22%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *insignificant

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Hyundai Getz 2002 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.3 liters per 100 km or 21% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Hyundai Getz advertised fuel economy is slightly better than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Hyundai Getz 2002 1.6i 105 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Hyundai Getz with 1.3 petrol engine and manual transmission (Hyundai Getz 2002 1.3 MPI 82 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Getz 2002 1.1i 62 HP manual 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+19%
1.3 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Getz 2002 1.3i 82 HP automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Hyundai Getz 2002 1.3 MPI 82 HP manual 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+26%
1.5 liter diesel engine
Hyundai Getz 2003 1.5 CRDi 82 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km-2%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Hyundai Getz 2002 1.6i 105 HP manual 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+22%
Hyundai Getz 2002 1.6i 105 HP automatic 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.