Honda Legend fuel consumption
Of all Honda Legend modifications produced from 1996 to 2010 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is similar compared to advertised consumption. Since 2006 the Honda Legend average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Honda Legend | |||
| 2006 | +9% | +3% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2007 | +11% | +3% | ||
| 2008 | +12% | +3% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Honda Legend.
2008 - 2010
Honda Legend 2008 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 20.3 MPG 11.6 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 21.6 MPG 10.9 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7 liter petrol engine | ||
| Honda Legend 2008 3.7 295 HP 4x4 automatic | 20.3 MPG 11.6 l/100km |
19.6 MPG 12.0 l/100km+3% |
2006 - 2008
Honda Legend 2006 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 19.8 MPG 11.9 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 19.1 MPG 12.3 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +3% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 liter petrol engine | ||
| Honda Legend 2006 3.5 295 HP 4x4 automatic | 19.8 MPG 11.9 l/100km |
19.1 MPG 12.3 l/100km+3% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.