Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Ford Maverick fuel consumption

Of all Ford Maverick modifications produced from 1993 to 2007 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 7% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 2000 Ford Maverick average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2001 it was slightly above industry average, at 2004 difference became similar to average and finally at 2005 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersFord Maverick
2000+4%+10%
Show all years
2001+5%+10%
2002+6%+10%
2003+6%+10%
2004+7%+7%
2005+8%insignificant
2006+9%insignificant
2007+11%insignificant

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford Maverick.

2000 - 2007

Ford Maverick 2000 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines20.4 MPG
11.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+7%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Ford Maverick 2000 2.0 i 16V 124 HP manual 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km+15%
Ford Maverick 2000 2.0 i 16V AWD 124 HP manual 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km+15%
2.3 liter petrol engine
Ford Maverick 2004 2.3 i 16V AWD 150 HP manual 21.2 MPG
11.1 l/100km
21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km-2%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Ford Maverick 2000 3.0 i V6 24V AWD 197 HP automatic 18.4 MPG
12.8 l/100km
18.5 MPG
12.7 l/100km-1%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.