Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Fiat Ulysse fuel consumption

Of all Fiat Ulysse modifications produced from 1994 to 2007 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 10% higher compared to advertised consumption. Since 2001 the Fiat Ulysse average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearDiesel cars
All carmakersFiat Ulysse
2001+6%+12%
Show all years
2002+7%+13%
2003+8%+14%
2004+9%+14%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Fiat Ulysse.

2002 - 2007

Fiat Ulysse 2002 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines23.4 MPG
10.1 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines32.3 MPG
7.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines30.4 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+7%

Fiat Ulysse 2002 automatic vs manual fuel consumption

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Fiat Ulysse 2002 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.8 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Fiat Ulysse with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Fiat Ulysse 2002 2.0 16v 136 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Fiat Ulysse 2002 2.0 16v 136 HP manual 25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km
Fiat Ulysse 2002 2.0 16v Automatic 136 HP automatic 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Fiat Ulysse 2002 2.0 16v JTD 109 HP manual 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
Fiat Ulysse 2002 2.0 16v JTD Automatic 109 HP automatic 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
Fiat Ulysse 2006 2.0 16v Multijet 120 Hp 120 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Fiat Ulysse 2006 2.0 16v Multijet 136 Hp 136 HP manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km0%
2.2 liter diesel engine
Fiat Ulysse 2002 2.2 16v JTD 128 HP manual 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+14%
Fiat Ulysse 2004 2.2 16v JTD 128 HP manual 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
2.9 liter petrol engine
Fiat Ulysse 2003 2.9 3.0 V6 24v 204 HP automatic 20.5 MPG
11.5 l/100km
1999 - 2002

Fiat Ulysse 1999 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines23.6 MPG
10.0 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines31.6 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+12%

Fiat Ulysse 1999 automatic vs manual fuel consumption

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Fiat Ulysse 1999 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.5 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Fiat Ulysse with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Fiat Ulysse 2001 2.0 16v JTD 109 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Fiat Ulysse 1999 1.8 99 HP manual 22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
1.9 liter diesel engine
Fiat Ulysse 1999 1.9 Tds 92 HP manual 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
Fiat Ulysse 1999 2.0 121 HP manual 22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km
Fiat Ulysse 1999 2.0 16v 136 HP manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
Fiat Ulysse 2000 2.0 16v Automatic 136 HP automatic 24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Fiat Ulysse 1999 2.0 JTD 109 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Fiat Ulysse 2001 2.0 16v JTD 109 HP manual 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+12%
2.1 liter diesel engine
Fiat Ulysse 1999 2.1 Tds 109 HP manual 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.