Dodge Durango fuel consumption
Of all Dodge Durango modifications produced from 1998 to 2020 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is similar compared to advertised consumption. Since 2004 the Dodge Durango average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Dodge Durango | |||
| 2004 | +7% | insignificant | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2005 | +8% | insignificant | ||
| 2006 | +9% | insignificant | ||
| 2007 | +11% | insignificant | ||
| 2008 | +12% | insignificant | ||
| 2013 | +23% | insignificant | ||
| 2014 | +26% | insignificant | ||
| 2015 | +27% | insignificant | ||
| 2016 | +28% | insignificant | ||
| 2017 | +28% | insignificant | ||
| 2018 | +28% | insignificant | ||
| 2019 | +28% | insignificant | ||
| 2020 | +27% | insignificant | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Dodge Durango.
2004 - 2008
Dodge Durango 2004 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 16.7 MPG 14.1 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 16.8 MPG 14.0 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7 liter petrol engine | ||
| DODGE Durango 2004 3.7L V6 213 HP automatic | 18.1 MPG 13.0 l/100km |
|
| 4.7 liter petrol engine | ||
| DODGE Durango 2004 4.7L V8 238 HP automatic | 16.1 MPG 14.6 l/100km |
|
| 5.7 liter petrol engine | ||
| DODGE Durango 2004 5.7L V8 349 HP 4x4 automatic | 16.1 MPG 14.6 l/100km |
15.3 MPG 15.4 l/100km+5% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.