Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Chevrolet Orlando fuel consumption

Of all Chevrolet Orlando modifications produced from 2011 to 2018 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 32% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 27% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 36% higher. Starting from 2011 Chevrolet Orlando average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2013 it was slightly above industry average, at 2014 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersChevrolet OrlandoAll carmakersChevrolet Orlando
2011+19%+19% +19%+36%
Show all years
2012+21%+19% +23%+36%
2013+23%+27% +27%+36%
2014+26%+27% +30%+36%
2015+27%+27% +33%+36%
2016+28%+27% +36%+36%
2017+28%+27% +38%+36%
2018+28%+27% +39%+36%
2011 - 2018

Chevrolet Orlando 2011 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines33.0 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+27%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines28.9 MPG
8.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+36%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Chevrolet Orlando 2011 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 4% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Chevrolet Orlando with automatic transmission consumes around 0.8 litres per 100 km or 10% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Chevrolet Orlando advertised fuel economy is among the 20% worst in its class, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is one of the worst.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Chevrolet Orlando 2011 1.8 141 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Chevrolet Orlando 2013 1.4 140 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km+44%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Chevrolet Orlando 2011 1.8 141 HP manual 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+19%
Chevrolet Orlando 2011 1.8 Automatic 141 HP automatic 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km+19%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Chevrolet Orlando 2011 2.0D 130 Hp 130 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+42%
Chevrolet Orlando 2011 2.0D 163 Hp 163 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+25%
Chevrolet Orlando 2011 2.0D 163 Hp Automatic 163 HP automatic 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+40%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.