Chevrolet Blazer fuel consumption
Of all Chevrolet Blazer modifications produced from 1994 to 2022 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 12% higher compared to advertised consumption. Since 1995 the Chevrolet Blazer average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Chevrolet Blazer | |||
| 1995 | +5% | +12% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 1996 | +4% | +12% | ||
| 1997 | +3% | +12% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Chevrolet Blazer.
1994 - 1998
Chevrolet Blazer 1994 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 17.3 MPG 13.6 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 15.1 MPG 15.6 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +12% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, Chevrolet Blazer 1994 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Chevrolet Blazer 1994 4.3 i V6 CPI 193 HP automatic | 14.7 MPG 16.0 l/100km |
|
| Chevrolet Blazer 1995 4.3 193 HP 4x4 automatic | 17.3 MPG 13.6 l/100km |
15.5 MPG 15.2 l/100km+12% |
| Chevrolet Blazer 1995 4.3 193 HP 4x4 manual | 17.3 MPG 13.6 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.