Real fuel consumption and economy logo

BMW Z3 fuel consumption

Of all BMW Z3 modifications produced from 1996 to 2003 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 10% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 1996 BMW Z3 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 1997 it was slightly above industry average, at 1998 difference became significantly higher than average and finally at 1999 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersBMW Z3
1996+4%insignificant
Show all years
1997+3%+6%
1998+3%+10%
1999+3%+8%
2000+4%+8%
2001+5%+9%
2002+6%+9%
2003+6%+11%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of BMW Z3.

1998 - 2003

BMW Z3 1998 coupe fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines24.1 MPG
9.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines21.3 MPG
11.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+13%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a BMW Z3 1998 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.9 liters per 100 km or 9% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation BMW Z3 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.7 litres per 100 km or 17% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the BMW Z3 advertised fuel economy is among the best, beating more than 80% of other cars, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 3.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (BMW Z3 2000 Coupe 3.0i 231 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has BMW Z3 with 2.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (BMW Z3 1998 Coupe 2.8i 193 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.8 liter petrol engine
BMW Z3 1998 Coupe 2.8i 193 HP manual 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km+9%
BMW Z3 1998 Coupe 2.8i 193 HP automatic 22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km
19.8 MPG
11.9 l/100km+14%
3.0 liter petrol engine
BMW Z3 2000 Coupe 3.0i 231 HP manual 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km+2%
BMW Z3 2000 Coupe 3.0i 231 HP automatic 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km+11%
3.2 liter petrol engine
BMW Z3 1998 3.2 321 HP manual 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km+28%
1996 - 2003

BMW Z3 1996 cabrio fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines24.7 MPG
9.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+6%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a BMW Z3 1996 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 8% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation BMW Z3 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.4 litres per 100 km or 14% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the BMW Z3 fuel economy is slightly better than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 3.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (BMW Z3 2000 Roadster 3.0i 231 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has BMW Z3 with 2.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (BMW Z3 1999 Roadster 2.8i 193 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
BMW Z3 1996 Roadster 1.8i 115 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+8%
BMW Z3 1999 roadster 1.8i S 118 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+8%
1.9 liter petrol engine
BMW Z3 1999 1.9 Roadster 1.8i 118 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+8%
BMW Z3 2000 Roadster 1.9i 118 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+9%
BMW Z3 2000 roadster 1.9i S 118 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+9%
BMW Z3 1996 Roadster 1.9i 140 HP manual 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+2%
BMW Z3 1996 Roadster 1.9i 140 HP automatic 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km+6%
BMW Z3 1999 1.9 Roadster 2.0i 150 HP manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km+2%
BMW Z3 1999 1.9 Roadster 2.0i 150 HP automatic 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
BMW Z3 1999 roadster 2.0i S 150 HP manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km+2%
BMW Z3 1999 roadster 2.0i S 150 HP automatic 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
2.2 liter petrol engine
BMW Z3 2000 Roadster 2.2i 170 HP manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+3%
BMW Z3 2000 Roadster 2.2i 170 HP automatic 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
BMW Z3 2000 roadster 2.2i S 170 HP manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+3%
BMW Z3 2000 roadster 2.2i S 170 HP automatic 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
2.8 liter petrol engine
BMW Z3 1997 Roadster 2.8i 192 HP manual 24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km
23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km+5%
BMW Z3 1997 Roadster 2.8i 192 HP automatic 22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km
19.0 MPG
12.4 l/100km+17%
BMW Z3 1999 Roadster 2.8i 193 HP manual 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km+7%
BMW Z3 1999 Roadster 2.8i 193 HP automatic 22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km
20.5 MPG
11.5 l/100km+11%
3.0 liter petrol engine
BMW Z3 2000 Roadster 3.0i 231 HP manual 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km+2%
BMW Z3 2000 Roadster 3.0i 231 HP automatic 23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km+12%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.